<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Falling Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pootergeek.com/2008/05/falling-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pootergeek.com/2008/05/falling-down/</link>
	<description>contains extended scenes of moderate fantasy menace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:51:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PooterGeek &#187; How Entertainment Industry Feuds Begin</title>
		<link>http://www.pootergeek.com/2008/05/falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-107290</link>
		<dc:creator>PooterGeek &#187; How Entertainment Industry Feuds Begin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pootergeek.com/?p=3200#comment-107290</guid>
		<description>[...] the space of a few days, My Scarlett Johansson post has become the subject of a round of Bloggese [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the space of a few days, My Scarlett Johansson post has become the subject of a round of Bloggese&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pootergeek.com/2008/05/falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-107286</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pootergeek.com/?p=3200#comment-107286</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure about Randy Newman being a &#039;non-singer&#039; - his voice was perfect (and very good technically, I&#039;d say) for those early songs of his, particularly the stuff on Good Old Boys. He strained himself when he started to write and perform outside of his &#039;natural&#039; zone - i.e movie and pop songs. 

And I think Dylan as a performer is vastly underrated - whatever one thinks of his voice (I love it), he is easily the best interpreter of his own songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure about Randy Newman being a &#8216;non-singer&#8217; - his voice was perfect (and very good technically, I&#8217;d say) for those early songs of his, particularly the stuff on Good Old Boys. He strained himself when he started to write and perform outside of his &#8216;natural&#8217; zone - i.e movie and pop&nbsp;songs. </p>
<p>And I think Dylan as a performer is vastly underrated - whatever one thinks of his voice (I love it), he is easily the best interpreter of his own&nbsp;songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PooterGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.pootergeek.com/2008/05/falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-107285</link>
		<dc:creator>PooterGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pootergeek.com/?p=3200#comment-107285</guid>
		<description>Often &quot;non-singer&quot; singers are talented songwriters, like Leonard Cohen or Randy Newman (though I think Randy Newman&#039;s songs would be even better if had a wider range). People who have a problem with Dylan&#039;s voice but like his songs can listen to, say, the Neville Brothers (amongst many others), or who can&#039;t bear Cohen&#039;s Jennifer Warnes. I&#039;m not sure what the point of Scarlett Johannson covering Tom Waits songs is, except that she&#039;s somewhat easier on the eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often &#8220;non-singer&#8221; singers are talented songwriters, like Leonard Cohen or Randy Newman (though I think Randy Newman&#8217;s songs would be even better if had a wider range). People who have a problem with Dylan&#8217;s voice but like his songs can listen to, say, the Neville Brothers (amongst many others), or who can&#8217;t bear Cohen&#8217;s Jennifer Warnes. I&#8217;m not sure what the point of Scarlett Johannson covering Tom Waits songs is, except that she&#8217;s somewhat easier on the&nbsp;eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.pootergeek.com/2008/05/falling-down/comment-page-1/#comment-107284</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pootergeek.com/?p=3200#comment-107284</guid>
		<description>I like singers and I envy those people who have the ability to sing really well. But then I also like &#039;non-singers&#039; - the best of whom is Mark E Smith. And then there&#039;s Dylan who, at least in the eighties, took the notion of &#039;singing&#039; to whole new levels. And, of course, there&#039;s Tom Waits whose songs Miss Johansson covers - which is what I thought accounted for her &#039;unusual approach&#039;.

Tiny Tim. Now there was a great non-singer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like singers and I envy those people who have the ability to sing really well. But then I also like &#8216;non-singers&#8217; - the best of whom is Mark E Smith. And then there&#8217;s Dylan who, at least in the eighties, took the notion of &#8216;singing&#8217; to whole new levels. And, of course, there&#8217;s Tom Waits whose songs Miss Johansson covers - which is what I thought accounted for her &#8216;unusual&nbsp;approach&#8217;.</p>
<p>Tiny Tim. Now there was a great&nbsp;non-singer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
