Today, unique visits to PooterGeek have been cruising at the elevated level of 50-plus an hour. Why? Because this site has just entered the top ten on Arabic Google for the search term “boobs”.
-
Recent Comments
-
Blogs
- a blog from the back room
- A Congregation Of Vapours
- Adloyada
- Antonia Bance
- Apropos Of Nothing
- Baggage Reclaim
- Bioinformatics.Org
- Black Triangle
- Bloggers4Labour
- Blognor Regis
- British Bullshit Foundation
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Chase Me Ladies
- Chocolate and Vodka
- Chris Brooke
- Clive Davis
- Common Endeavour
- Conor’s Commentary
- Conservative Home
- Covered, the band
- Daily Ablution, The
- David Thompson
- Drink-Soaked Trots For War
- Edward Meinert
- Euston Manifesto Blog
- Fisking Central
- Freemania
- Gauche
- Ghost of a flea
- Grammar Puss
- Hak Mao
- Harry’s Place
- Hopi Sen
- Index on Censorship
- Jackie Danicki
- James Hamilton
- James Higham
- Jo Salmon
- Jonathan Derbyshire
- Kerron Cross
- Labour Friends of Iraq
- Let’s Be Sensible
- Mars Hill
- Martin In The Margins
- Maximum Bob
- Mick Hartley
- Muscular Liberals
- Never Trust A Hippy
- normblog
- Oliver Kamm
- Olly’s Onions
- Plural Identities
- Political Betting
- Polling Report
- qwghlm.co.uk
- Rob Newman
- Sadie’s Tavern
- Sepial
- Shuggy’s Blog
- Skuds
- Slashdot
- Squander Two Blog
- Stephen Pollard
- Stumbling and Mumbling
- The Agnostic Monk Files
- The Floodlit Allotment
- The Periodic Table
- The Stopping Service
- The Wedding Photography Blog
- Tim Almond
- Tim Worstall
- We’ll get it right next time
- White Sun of the Desert
- wongaBlog
-
Friends
- Adam Woolfe
- Adloyada
- Andrew Anthony
- Apropos Of Nothing
- Bloggers4Labour
- casualsavant
- Chris Brooke
- Claire Berlinski
- Clive Davis
- Common Endeavour
- Covered, the band
- Edward Meinert
- First Drafts
- George Szirtes
- Helena Seth-Smith
- Index on Censorship
- Jonathan Derbyshire
- Linda Grant
- Never Trust A Hippy
- normblog
- Plural Identities
- The Floodlit Allotment
- The Periodic Table
- The Stopping Service
- Transmission Studios
-
Meta
-
Pages
-
Archives
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- May 2002
- April 2002
3 Comments
Wow!, he Poor Mouth doesn’t get that sort of traffic but a post about the reopening of the Pompeii brothel, the Lupanare, seems to have had a big effect on my traffic levels. I am beginning to suspect that some people use the internet to look at rude pictures!
The link for site no. 1 of the current top 10 says “big boobs for your down days.” Of course, in some contexts–e.g., when the term means “simpleton” or “embarrassing mistake”–big boobs might contribute to _making_ a down day down. And even when it means what all you naughty people are thinking of, I imagine it/they can sometimes be depressing. So the idea of big boobs as some sort of panacea on one’s down days is just really, really implausible, and I don’t think that site should be no. 1.
Oh ta! NOW you mention it! Spent ages recently trying to get my business website up the rankings and all I had to do was put rude words on it? Might be a bit difficult as it sells educational software I suppose.